USPTO serial 86743114
OJE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OJE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason P. Zedeck
JASON P. ZEDECK Law Office Of Jason ZedeckPO Box 35210Los Angeles, CA 90035-0210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-aging cream; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-aging toner; Anti-wrinkle cream; Bar soap; Bath lotion; Bath milks; Bath oil; Bath oils; Bath salts; Bath soaps; Beauty soap; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Body creams; Body masks; Body oil; Body scrub; Body sprays; Body wash; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sunscreen preparations; Essential oils; Eye cream; Eye lotions; Eye make-up remover; Eyes make-up; Face and body lotions; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansers; Facial scrubs; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair treatment; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair oils; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair sprays and hair gels; Laundry detergent; Laundry soap; Lip balm; Lotions for skin, face and body; Make-up preparations for the face and body; Massage oil; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Natural essential oils; Non-foaming cosmetic preparations for skin, face and body; Non-medicated anti-aging serum; Non-medicated bath salts; Non-medicated cleansers for personal use, namely, skin cleansers, facial cleansers; Non-medicated cleansers, namely, skin cleansers, facial cleansers; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated skin toners; Perfume; Perfume oils; Perfumed soaps; Perfumes; Perfumes and toilet waters; Scented bathing salts; Shampoos; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin conditioners; Skin conditioning creams for cosmetic purposes; Skin cream; Skin lotion; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin soap; Skin toners; Sun block; Sun screen; Sun screen preparations; Sun-block lotions; Sunscreen cream; Toilet water; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
| 004 | Candles; Perfumed candles; Scented candles | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |