Drawing for DOWNTOWN COLUMBIA

USPTO serial 86744710

DOWNTOWN COLUMBIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENBLATT, ANNA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOWNTOWN COLUMBIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Patton

JOHN PATTON PATTON LAW GROUP PLLC950 E STATE HWY 114 STE 160SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Real estate developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance