USPTO serial 86745038
INTELLIGENT HOSTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGENT HOSTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Ploen
SEAN PLOEN Ploen Law Firm Pc100 S 5th St Ste 1900Minneapolis, MN 55402-1267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Downloadable computer software, namely, software for use in connection with managing electronic data and databases, database administration, managing cloud applications, and self-automation of database-management activities; database administration services, namely, management of computer databases for others; information technology support services, namely, technical advice relating to the installation of computer servers and hardware; electronic data storage services, namely, storing electronic data at data centers; electronic storage of files and documents; remote support services, namely, remote administration and management of in-house and hosted datacenter devices, databases, and software applications, and remote database administration services; remote service desk and helpdesk services; remote monitoring of computer systems for others; Web site hosting services; computer hard drive data backup and recovery services; private network services, namely, providing access to a secure network of dedicated servers and cloud servers; e-mail migration and server migration services; migration of datacenter, server and database applications; database design and creation services; remote backup of electronic data; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in data storage, data management and project management; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others for use in providing email and data backup; hosting of disaster-recovery web sites; providing on-line, non-downloadable, Internet-based software applications for businesses to monitor and backup data and computing functions; cloud computing services, namely, cloud hosting in the nature of scalable and interoperable hosting of computer software, Internet websites, Internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content, and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |