USPTO serial 86745283
ACCUTEC BLADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCUTEC BLADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin C. Vance
ROBIN C. VANCE McGuirewoods Llp800 E Canal StRichmond, VA 23219-3916UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutting tools and blades for home and industry, namely, utility knives and blades therefor, single edge, razor blades, pocket knives and blades therefor, carpet knives and blades therefor, roofer's knives and blades therefor, putty knives, hand operated scrapers and blades therefor, taping knives, chisels, wire strippers and blades therefor, razor knives and blades therefor, hand operated carton cutters and blades therefor; cutting tools and blades for hobbies, arts and crafts, namely, hobby knives and blades therefor, hand operated razor saws and blades therefor, and storage chests specially adapted for the hobby knives and blades; safety non-electric shavers, safety razors, knives and scissors; non-electric shavers and razors and blades therefor, disposable razors; hair-cutting razors, electric shavers and blades therefor; barber shears and blades therefor, hair cutting scissors, replacement parts and fittings for scissors, non-electric hair clippers, thinning shears, hair styling shears, and blades therefor; manicure and pedicure instruments, namely, nail clippers, nail scissors, cuticle clippers, cuticle scissors, non-electric nail buffers, nail files, cushion board nail files, nose hair trimmers, hand-operated hair clippers, hand tools in the nature of planers, callus rasps, nippers, cuticle pushers, cuticle scissors, acrylic clippers for cutting and trimming acrylic nails, cushion board nail file for nail care, manicure sticks, namely, sticks that function as cuticle removers and pushers, nail files, non-electric planers, callus rasps, tweezers, comedone blackhead and whitehead extractors, eyelash curlers, thinning and texturizing shears, hair shaping scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Microtome blades | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical knives and scalpels; surgical razors and blades; medical razors and blades for use during medical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AccuTec Blades, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEC, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ACCUTEC BLADES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |