USPTO serial 86746174
MAYNARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAYNARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
Bryanston, 2021, ZA
Other trademarks owned by TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
Bryanston, 2021, ZA
Other trademarks owned by TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Smith
JEFFREY SMITH MILLEN-WHITE2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sweets, chocolates, candy, sweetmeat, toffees, liquorice, chewing gum, gum sweets, sugar sticks, namely, crystal sugar pieces in the form of sticks; biscuits; cakes; pastries; confectionery made of sugar, confectionery made of sugar substitutes, chocolate confections, fruit jelly candies, gummy candies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER FOOD BRANDS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MAYNARDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |