USPTO serial 86746502
ADLENS INTERFACE+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADLENS INTERFACE+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M. BAKER Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo P C666 3rd Ave Fl 24New York, NY 10017-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods, apparatus and instruments; eyewear; adjustable optical power eyewear; eyewear for computer use; adjustable optical power eyewear for use with computers, monitors, laptops, notebooks, tablets and smartphones; eyeglasses; adjustable optical power eyeglasses; eyeglasses for computer use; adjustable optical power eyeglasses for use with computers, monitors, laptops, notebooks, tablets and smartphones; eyeglass frames; eyeglass lenses; eyeglass lenses adapted to filter HEV (high energy visible) light; corrective lenses; adjustable optical power lenses; protective eyewear; eyeglasses adapted to protect the eyes; eyeglasses having filtering lenses; eyeglasses having filtering lenses adapted to filter HEV (high energy visible) light; adjustable optical power eyeglasses having filtering lenses; adjustable optical power eyeglasses having filtering lenses adapted to filter HEV (high energy visible) light for use with computers, monitors, laptops, notebooks, tablets and smartphones; eyeglasses with partial vision occlusion; eye protection wear for sports; eyeglass shields; industrial and military safety eye protection articles; goggles for the protection of the eyes; masks for protection against toxic, noxious or harmful substances or material; eyeglass cases, containers and holders; eyeglass chains, cords and retaining straps; eyepieces and instruments containing eyepieces; eye shades; prescription eye shades; eye shades having adjustable optical power lenses; sunglasses; tinted eyeglasses; sunglasses having adjustable optical power lenses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |