USPTO serial 86746981
TD INSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TD INSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas A. Rettew
Douglas A. Rettew Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York AveWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, underwriting, processing, issuing and administration of all types of insurance; insurance brokerage; risk management, namely, financial risk assessment services; administration of employee benefit plans, namely, concerning insurance and finance; insurance claims administration; insurance claims processing; insurance agency services; insurance claim processing and insurance underwriting services, in the fields of travel, life, health, accident, fire, vehicle, worker's compensation, property and casualty; insurance brokerage services; insurance brokerage services provided via the internet; insurance consultation services; insurance administration and insurance services in the nature of loss control management services; providing insurance and insurance underwriting information; reinsurance brokerage services; financial and direct risk management services, in the nature of exposure and financial modeling and analysis, namely, compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for financial and insurance purposes, for insurance actuarial analysis purposes, for catastrophe modeling in the nature of compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for financial or insurance purposes, and for market security review in the nature of comprising compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for financial or insurance purposes; insurance risk management services, namely, insurance portfolio analysis and optimization, and providing enterprise financial risk management advice and financial risk management consulting services to others; insurance appraisal services, namely, of personal and commercial real estate property; electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; insurance subrogation; providing a full range of insurance and risk management services for businesses, namely, insurance administration, insurance brokerage, and insurance underwriting services for all types of insurance, and financial risk assessment | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Investigative services related to insurance claims | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Toronto-Dominion Bank
- Other trademarks owned by The Toronto-Dominion Bank
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TD INSURANCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |