Drawing for C-LINK

USPTO serial 86749999

C-LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C-LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael K. Grace

MICHAEL K. GRACE Grace + Grace LLPP.O. Box 412666Los Angeles, CA 90041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009battery chargersACTIVE
011Flashlights; electric hand warmersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance