Drawing for REPLENISH

USPTO serial 86750445

REPLENISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO, JEANE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REPLENISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Webb

Karen Webb Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multifunctional electronic devices for transmitting, storing, displaying, and uploading information regarding potential purchases via a global communications network; electronically encoded key fobs and tags; barcode readers; barcode scanners; handheld scanner; computer software for transmitting, storing, manipulating, organizing recording, and reviewing text, images, audio, video and data via global computer networks, wireless networks, and electronic communications networks; computer software enabling content, text, and other data to be downloaded to and accessed on a computer or other portable consumer electronic device; voice recognition software; speech to text conversion software; text to speech conversion software; computer software used to process voice commands, and create audio responses to voice commands; computer software enabling communication, including scheduling appointments, reminders, and events on an electronic calendar; electronic controllers to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices excluding gaming apparatus; electronic controllers to impart sensory feedback, namely, sounds and vibrations that are perceptible to the user; computer and electronic publishing softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 9, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Mar 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 3, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 3, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance