USPTO serial 86750621
DETECT TO PROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DETECT TO PROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey K. Weaver
Jeffrey K. Weaver WEAVER AUSTIN VILLENUEVE & SAMPSON LLPP.O. Box 70250OAKLAND, CA 94612-0920UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific instruments, namely, sensors for detecting the levels of THC and other drugs, electronic calibrators for breath-THC testing devices; electronic sensors for drug testing; computer software to test THC levels, to enable uploading, downloading, accessing, posting, displaying, processing, streaming, linking, sharing or otherwise providing electronic data or information via computer and communication networks, and to otherwise transmit data and information between fixed and remote sites; computer application software for the collection, transmission, storage and sharing of images, photos, text, data and information to others via the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Sensors for detecting the levels of THC and other drugs; electronic sensors for drug testing; electronic device for collecting and detecting levels of THC and other drugs; electronic breath testing units; electrochemical breath testing units; sensors for drug testing; breath testing units and sensors for testing levels of THC; electrochemical drug sensors; all of the aforementioned goods for testing of human breath and/or other bodily fluids for testing for the presence of THC and other drugs | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing displays, exhibits, and workshops in the field of effects of marijuana use | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Drug testing, namely, breath testing for drug consumption for use in education on the effects of drug use; testing of breath for evidence of drug consumption through the use of a breath testing unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hound Labs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hound Labs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named DETECT TO PROTECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2017 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |