Drawing for CINELIGHT

USPTO serial 86752193

CINELIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CINELIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diana M. Rutowski and Kristin S. Cornuelle

Diana M. Rutowski and Kristin S. Cornuelle Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIrvine, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services; computer software design services; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer services, namely, providing electronic data storage; providing a web hosting platform for uploading, downloading, and sharing digital contentACTIVEMar 18, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 1, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 14, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 14, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 2, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 3, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance