Drawing for PERFECT PUTT

USPTO serial 86753953

PERFECT PUTT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT PUTT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. William Larson

H. WILLIAM LARSON Larson & Larson P A11199 69th StLargo, FL 33773-5504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ARTIFICIAL PUTTING GREEN COMPRISED OF A BASE, ARTIFICIAL GRASS, A CUP, AND A FLAGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 17, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance