Drawing for LEGENDARY BEEF

USPTO serial 86754306

LEGENDARY BEEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGENDARY BEEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra J. Franklin

SANDRA J FRANKLINPO BOX 4055TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49685-4055UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Butcher cuts of beef; raw meatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 18, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 27, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 5, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 5, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 22, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance