Drawing for ION HEALING

USPTO serial 86757066

ION HEALING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ION HEALING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela B. Huff

Pamela B. Huff Schwegman Lundberg Woessner P.A.P.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for providing healthcare professionals with medical, health, and wellness information related to the provision of wound care services to patientsACTIVEFeb 16, 2015
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for providing healthcare professionals with medical, health, and wellness information related to the provision of wound care services to patients accessible through mobile applicationsACTIVEFeb 16, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 18, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 12, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 20, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 1, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 19, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 19, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 19, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance