USPTO serial 86758027
ONSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colette A. Durst
COLETTE A. DURST Tyco International6600 Congress AveBoca Raton, FL 33487-1213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sensors and detectors for use in determining safety and security risks, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; sensors and detectors for gathering safety and security data, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; sensors and detectors for gathering safety and security data for transmission to insurance agencies in relation to the status of property, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; sensors and detectors for gathering safety and security data for transmission to insurance agencies in relation to the status of commercial premises, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; sensors and detectors for gathering safety and security data for transmission to insurance agencies in relation to the status of domestic premises, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; sensors and detectors for gathering, processing and transmitting safety and security data using internet of things technology, namely, proximity, carbon monoxide levels, heat, gas, temperature increase, glass break, smoke detection, flooding, fire, flame flare ups, full grease traps, alarm/disarm of security systems, open doors, weather threats, crime threats and motion; data streaming apparatus, namely sensors and detectors for use in temperature readings, measuring carbon monoxide levels, smoke levels, water flood level, intrusion detection; data streaming software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |