Drawing for LUSCIOUS MOUTH WATERING WARM BUNS, POP FIRM FRIES, HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS COOL AND FROSTY SODA CREAMY SHAKES, HOT BU HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS, POP, LUSCIOUS MOU LUSCIOUS MOUTH CREAM OP, FIRM FRIES, HOT MOUTH COOL AND FROSTY S STEAKS HOT BURGERS,

USPTO serial 86758294

LUSCIOUS MOUTH WATERING WARM BUNS, POP FIRM FRIES, HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS COOL AND FROSTY SODA CREAMY SHAKES, HOT BU HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS, POP, LUSCIOUS MOU LUSCIOUS MOUTH CREAM OP, FIRM FRIES, HOT MOUTH COOL AND FROSTY S STEAKS HOT BURGERS,

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LUSCIOUS MOUTH WATERING WARM BUNS, POP FIRM FRIES, HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS COOL AND FROSTY SODA CREAMY SHAKES, HOT BU HOT BURGERS, SIZZLING STEAKS, POP, LUSCIOUS MOU LUSCIOUS MOUTH CREAM OP, FIRM FRIES, HOT MOUTH COOL AND FROSTY S STEAKS HOT BURGERS,?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria J. B. Doyle

VICTORIA J. B. DOYLE Fried Frank Llp1 New York PlzNew York, NY 10004-1901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RESTAURANT SERVICES AND TAKE-OUT RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance