Drawing for DE NOVO

USPTO serial 86759958

DE NOVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE NOVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Taylor L. Davis

Taylor L. Davis PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPThree Embarcadero Center, 20th FloorOffice of the General CounselSan Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an interactive website containing business information for users to identify areas of innovation and potential disruption to businesses across various metrics including industry, technology, and business functionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance