Drawing for FORESIGHT

USPTO serial 86761849

FORESIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORESIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES M. WU

JAMES M. WU Jw Law Group84 W Santa Clara St Ste 820San Jose, CA 95113-1810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic automation control systems for robotic machines for industrial applications, namely, electrical control systems for industrial robotic arm, work cell, and automatic production line; electrical controller for industrial applications for collecting data from pressure sensors, temperature sensors, radiation sensors, altitude sensors, collision sensors, power sensors, magnet sensors, displacement sensors, connectivity sensors, force-torque sensors, and position sensors from industrial robotic arm, work cell, and automatic production line; computer operating software for controlling industrial robotic arm, work cell, and automatic production line, namely, software for managing robotic operation, artificial intelligence, and user interface; all of the foregoing not for use with agricultural tools, implements attached to a moving vehicle, loading dock equipment, or land-based vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance