USPTO serial 86763047
X'PERT3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X'PERT3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky Pierce Atwood LLP254 Commercial StPortland, ME 04101-4664UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) X-ray analytical apparatus for non-medical purposes; diffractometers; X-ray diffraction apparatus, X-ray diffractometers; X-ray analyzers, namely, non-medical X-ray analyzer apparatus for use in analyzing samples of composites for use in scientific applications; wafer analyzers; X-ray tubes for non-medical purposes; X-ray apparatus for non-medical purposes; computer software and hardware for use with X-ray diffraction and X-ray diffraction apparatus; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid; none of the aforesaid goods relating to X-ray fluorescence spectrometers or to X-ray fluorescence spectrometry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |