Drawing for GENIUS

USPTO serial 86763104

GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

DOUGLAS R. WOLF Wolf Greenfield & Sacks Pc600 Atlantic Ave Fl 23Boston, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric submersible pumps, pump systems consisting primarily of electric submersible pumps, and component and replacement parts thereof, all sold as a unit with the pumps and pump systems, namely, pumps, motors, seals, protectors, gas separators, intakes, gauges, power cables, variable frequency drives, operating softwareACTIVE—
037Consulting services in the field of installation of electric submersible pumps, systems, and components thereofACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of remote monitoring of the functioning and use of electrical equipment, namely, electric submersible pumps, systems, and components thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Aug 10, 2017ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jun 23, 2017INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Jun 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 14, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 24, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance