Drawing for AZURE

USPTO serial 86763909

AZURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Assmus

RICHARD M. ASSMUS Mayer Brown LlpPO Box 2828Chicago, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a website featuring product and services ratings of others in the field of home contract services recommended by consumersACTIVE—
037Home maintenance, preservation, renovation, repair, and improvement services; providing a website featuring information in the fields of home concierge services and home concierge consulting services, namely, information featuring home repair and home maintenanceACTIVE—
045Home concierge services, namely, personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations, running errands and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs, all rendered in residential complexes and homesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 13, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 31, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance