USPTO serial 86764783
PSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I. ROZSA Rozsa Law Group Lc18757 Burbank Blvd Ste 220Tarzana, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INLINE SKATE AND SKATEBOARD PROTECTIVE HELMETS; PROTECTIVE HELMETS, NAMELY, HELMETS FOR USE WITH SPORTS SUCH AS LACROSSE AND BASEBALL, NAMELY, BASEBALL AND FASTPITCH BATTERS HELMETS, BASEBALL AND FASTPITCH CATCHERS HELMETS; BICYCLE HELMETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SHIN GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, BASEBALL SHIN GUARDS; CHEST GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE, BASEBALL CHEST PROTECTOR; KNEE PADS FOR ATHLETIC USE; SHOULDER PADS, RIB PADS AND FOREARM PADS FOR USE IN LACROSSE; BASEBALLS AND SOFTBALLS; PLASTIC BASE BALLS; BAT STANDS; WHEELS FOR USE WITH SKATES, NAMELY, INLINE SKATES AND QUAD ROLLER SKATES; WHEELS FOR USE WITH SKATEBOARDS; WHEELS FOR USE WITH SCOOTERS, LACROSSE BALLS; LACROSSE SHAFTS; PROTECTIVE WEAR, NAMELY, PROTECTIVE WEAR FOR INLINE SKATES AND SKATEBOARDS, namely, INLINE SKATE AND SKATEBOARD KNEE PADS, INLINE SKATE AND SKATEBOARD ELBOW PADS, INLINE SKATE AND SKATEBOARD WRIST GUARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |