USPTO serial 86765202
MARKET LANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARKET LANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
ALEX PATEL Patel & Almeida P C16830 Ventura Blvd Ste 360Encino, CA 91436-1711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Grocery food products, namely, meat, seafood, and poultry; meat extracts; preserved, dried, frozen, tinned and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; fruit sauces, namely, apple sauce and compotes; eggs, milk and other dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cheese; edible oils and fats; fruit preserves, pickles; tomato products, namely, tinned tomatoes and tomato paste; prepared, tinned and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Prepared food products, namely, prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flour, and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars and other cereal-derived food products to be used as breakfast food, namely, breakfast cereals; pasta and pasta products; noodles; rice products, namely, rice cakes; bakery products in this class, namely, bread, biscuits, cakes, pastries, muffins, pies; snack foods in this class, namely, snack foods made from rice or corn, cereal bars; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard, pepper, vinegar, sauces, condiments, namely, pepper sauce and spices in this class; salad dressings; prepared foods and prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; tinned, preserved, prepared, frozen and dried foods and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; dried and preserved garden herbs; confectionery made of sugar | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed grains; fresh fruits and vegetables; fresh herbs; fresh nuts; unprocessed edible seeds, natural plants and flowers; malt for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; Retail store, grocery store, convenience store and variety store services featuring fresh food products, tinned and frozen food products, snack food, bakery products and grocery products | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; food bar services, juice bar services, salad bars, snack bars, cafe and take-away food and drink restaurant outlets; food and drink catering; food and drink preparation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Market Lane IP Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MARKET LANE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |