USPTO serial 86767492
SAGEBROOK HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAGEBROOK HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Mizrahi
MARK B. MIZRAHI Wolf Rifkin Shapiro Schulman & Rabkin Llp11400 W Olympic Blvd Fl 9Los Angeles, CA 90064-1582UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | COOKING UTENSILS, NAMELY, COOKING SPOONS, AND COOKING FORKS; DINNERWARE; GLASS AND WOODEN BOWLS; NAPKIN HOLDERS; NAPKIN RINGS; SERVING TONGS, SERVING SPOONS, SERVING FORKS, SAUCERS, AND MUGS; GLASSWARE, NAMELY, STEMWARE AND BEVERAGE GLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | PLACE MATS, TABLE NAPKINS AND, TABLE CLOTHS MADE OF LINEN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Home, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Home, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SAGEBROOK HOME LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SAGEBROOK HOME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2017 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |