Drawing for FUNCTIONALRX

USPTO serial 86768178

FUNCTIONALRX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUNCTIONALRX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nelly Samadi

NELLY SAMADI Raj Abhyanker P C451 N Shoreline BlvdMountain View, CA 94043-4605UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for computers, tablets and other digital devices used for the physical delivery of medical products and services in order to assist medical professionals in assessing a patient's suitability to take pain medication and assisting in the diagnosis of a patient's functional abilities as a course of treatmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 21, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 21, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 2, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 20, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 20, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance