USPTO serial 86768647
ITHEMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2017
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ITHEMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK, US
Oklahoma City, OK, US
LANSING, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ibrahim M. Hallaj
Ibrahim M. Hallaj Intrinsic Law Corp.12 Gill St., Suite 1900Woburn, MA 01801United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data migration software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers moving on-line data including websites, web assets, and media; marketing software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create, maintain and send email, content and social media updates; content software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create, maintain and send content to websites and social media accounts; content marketing software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create, maintain and send content to websites and social media accounts; social media software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create, maintain and send content from a website to one or multiple social media accounts; billing software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to sell physical and digital goods and services from a website; e-commerce software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to sell physical and digital goods and services from a website; security software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to enable security features to protect a website; backup software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create archivable backups of their website; analytics software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to view and report traffic patterns, user interactions and other information on a website; reporting software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to create and send reports via download and email providing them with the status, health, and prosperity of a website; maintenance software for website owners, website managers, website designers, and website developers to be able to create, update, maintain, and monitor one or multiple websites | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 17, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |