USPTO serial 86768711
BOLTON POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOLTON POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene S. Winter
GENE S. WINTER St Onge Steward Johnston & Reens Llc986 Bedford StStamford, CT 06905-5610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, circular saws, jig saws, angle grinders, drill sets, hand sanders, cutoff saws, log splitters, electric chainsaws, gas trimmers, soldering tools, drilling tools, cutting tools, sanding tools, grinding tools, mixing tools, shaping tools, snow blowers, glue guns, nail guns, air hoses, blow guns, air regulators, power-operated oscillating multi tools with oscillating attachments for sanding and grinding, power-operated rotary multi tools with accessories in the nature of cut off discs and attachments for grinding, sanding and woodworking, electric pruning saws, electric pole saws; powered loppers, grass shears and their accessories, in the nature of replacement blades; electric planers and planer replacement blades, routers and accessories in the nature of router trim attachments; power-operated saws, namely, circular saws, trim saws, jig saws, reciprocating saws, powered hand saws and accessories therefor, namely, power saw blades for cutting and power abrasive saw blades; power-operated angle grinders and grinding wheels; power-operated nailing guns; vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaner bags; electric-powered caulk gun; electric sanders, namely, belt sanders, finishing sanders, sheet sanders and orbital sanders; painting systems comprised of airless paint sprayers, powered paint rollers, powered paint edgers, stain and sealant applicators for use with the sprayers and accessories therefor in the nature of sticks, pads, and rollers, all sold as a unit; lawn mowers; electric lawn trimmers; power-operated lawn edgers; electric hedge trimmers; power-operated blowers; electric lawn vacuums and sweepers; power-operated lawn and garden tillers; power-operated garden cultivators; corded and cordless chain saws; multi-purpose high pressure washers; lawn and garden string trimmer spools; chains for chain saws for use with power machines for cutting concrete and stone, and parts and accessories in the nature of chains and bar mounts; and chains for chain saws for use with power machines for cutting concrete and stone, and parts and accessories in the nature of chains, bar mounts, and sharpening stones, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |