USPTO serial 86769992
FIBERLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIBERLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Lesser
JACQUELINE M LESSER BAKER & HOSTETLER2929 ARCH STREETFLOOR 12PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Allograft tissue and bone for use in connection with processed cellular bone matrix containing stem cells for use in the treatment of musculoskeletal defects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |