USPTO serial 86771017
SPIFFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5881856Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2019
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPIFFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICHMOND, QC, CA
RICHMOND, QC, CA
La Maison Cannelle Sans Gluten Inc.
Richmond, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by La Maison Cannelle Sans Gluten Inc.
Richmond, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer D. Silverman
Jennifer D. Silverman Jennifer Silverman PLLC348 West 57th St.Suite 331New York, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Gluten free food products, namely, prepared food consisting primarily of meat, fish, milk, nut, tigernut, cooked fruits and cooked vegetables, and ready to eat prepared food consisting primarily of meat, fish, milk, nut, tigernut, cooked fruits and cooked vegetables; stock mixes in the nature of chicken stock mixes and beef stock mixes; mousses in the nature of chicken mousses, fruit mousses not being dessert mousses, fois gras mousses, liver pate mousses and liver paste mousses; dehydrated stock, namely, chicken and vegetable stock | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Gluten free food products, namely, pizzas, prepared food consisting primarily of prepared pasta, prepared pizzas, condiments, pizza sauce, meat sauce, spaghetti sauce, ready to eat prepared food in the nature of cakes, cereal bars, high-protein cereal bars, sandwiches, pie dough, muffins, brownies, cookies, cakes, pies, bread, sauce, cereal flakes being breakfast cereal, cereal based snack foods, flour, starches for food, bagel, English muffins, croutons, dessert mousses and chocolate; barbecue sauce; sauce mixes such as gravy and béchamel; poutine sauce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LES ALIMENTS GMC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LES ALIMENTS GMC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by La Maison Cannelle Sans Gluten Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LES ALIMENTS GMC INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SPIFFY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |