Drawing for BIONX

USPTO serial 86771167

BIONX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIONX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Hall

Michael E. Hall Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni PLLC50 Doaks LaneMarblehead, MA 01945UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Artificial limbs; artificial joints; prostheses for feet, ankles, and legs; orthotics for feet, ankles, and legs; all of the foregoing not featuring or incorporating electronic stimulation functionalityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 3, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 12, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance