USPTO serial 86771360
YARDSTICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YARDSTICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel A. Rice
RACHEL A. RICE MODUS LAW, LTD.3002 BLUFF STREETSUITE 300BOULDER, CO 80301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable webinars in the field of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Downloadable e-books in the field of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Downloadable guides and manuals in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building and development and management development; Downloadable written articles in the field of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; A series of downloadable books, written articles, handouts and worksheets in the field of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Downloadable worksheets, handouts, guides, summaries, and outlines in the field of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to track and manage goals, progress, skills, and development in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to access educational materials, assessment tools and progress metrics in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Providing a website that enables users to subscribe to coaching, mentoring, and/or educational services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling business executives, managers, leaders, and employees to access assessment tools and surveys and educational materials, exchange ideas and collaborate in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to access educational materials and assessment tools in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to set, track, and manage goals and progress in the fields of leadership development, organizational development, executive coaching, team building, and management development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |