Drawing for JEFE DE JEFES

USPTO serial 86772484

JEFE DE JEFES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEFE DE JEFES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward R. Hearn

EDWARD R. HEARN Law Offices Of Edward R Hearn P C111 N Market St Ste 300San Jose, CA 95113-1116UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital and analog media, namely, phonograph records, pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, downloadable audio recordings and audio-visual recordings, DVDs, high definition digital discs, all of the foregoing featuring music; pre-recorded phonograph records, digital compact discs, video tapes, laser discs, and video and computer game programs, all of the foregoing featuring dramatic and musical content; computer software applications for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers for use in electronic storage of data, all of the foregoing featuring dramatic and musical contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance