Drawing for THE LEAN BEAN PROTEIN MACHINE

USPTO serial 86772580

THE LEAN BEAN PROTEIN MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE LEAN BEAN PROTEIN MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raman N. Dewan

RAMAN N. DEWAN Jackson Walker L L P100 Congress Ave Ste 1100Austin, TX 78701-4042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Snacks made primarily from beansACTIVEMar 31, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 3, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 3, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 21, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 7, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 6, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 6, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 3, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 3, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 3, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 3, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 3, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 6, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 6, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance