Drawing for CHIME BE HEARD

USPTO serial 86772637

CHIME BE HEARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIME BE HEARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID G SCHELZEL

DAVID G SCHELZEL BEST & FLANAGAN LLPSTE 270060 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile applications for conducting surveys and polls, for sharing and measuring public opinion, for sharing, discussing and commenting on issues and topics of public interest, for uploading and sharing audio/visual files, for social networking, and for sending and receiving messagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 3, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance