USPTO serial 86772829
THE ARBROATH SMOKEHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ARBROATH SMOKEHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Uddingston Lanarkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cole
THOMAS W. COLE Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole P C7918 Jones Branch Dr Ste 500Mc Lean, VA 22102-3366UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish; fish products; trout; trout products; fresh trout (not live); salmon; salmon products; fresh salmon (not live); cod; cod products; fresh cod (not live); haddock; haddock products; fresh haddock (not live); prepared fish; prepared trout; prepared salmon; prepared cod; prepared haddock; smoked fish; smoked trout; smoked salmon; smoked cod; smoked haddock; preserved fish; preserved trout; preserved salmon; preserved cod; preserved haddock; pickled fish; pickled trout; pickled salmon; pickled cod; pickled haddock; cured fish; cured trout; cured salmon; cured cod; cured haddock; prepared meals consisting primarily of fish; prepared meals consisting primarily of trout; prepared meals consisting primarily of salmon; prepared meals consisting primarily of cod; prepared meals consisting primarily of haddock; packaged meals consisting primarily of fish; packaged meals consisting primarily of trout; packaged meals consisting primarily of salmon; packaged meals consisting primarily of cod; packaged meals consisting primarily of haddock; snack foods consisting primarily of fish; snack foods consisting primarily of trout; snack foods consisting primarily of salmon; snack foods consisting primarily of cod; snack foods consisting primarily of haddock; chilled foods consisting primarily of fish; chilled foods consisting primarily of trout; chilled foods consisting primarily of salmon; chilled foods consisting primarily of cod; chilled foods consisting primarily of haddock; frozen foods consisting primarily of fish; frozen foods consisting primarily of trout; frozen foods consisting primarily of salmon; frozen foods consisting primarily of cod; frozen foods consisting primarily of haddock; frozen fish; frozen trout; frozen salmon; frozen cod; frozen haddock; dried fish; dried trout; dried salmon; dried cod; dried haddock; farmed fish; farmed trout; farmed salmon; farmed cod; farmed haddock; tinned fish; tinned trout; tinned salmon; tinned cod; tinned haddock; marinated fish; fish mousse; trout mousse; salmon mousse; cod mousse; haddock mousse; herring; cured herring; smoked herring; salted herring; kippers; kipper products; tinned kippers; fish fillets; fish cakes; fish croquettes; fish roe; seafood; shellfish (not live); lobster; shrimp; clams; mussels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |