USPTO serial 86772839
MISSION CRITICAL PRECISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISSION CRITICAL PRECISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Hall
MICHAEL E HALL KACVINSKY DAISAK BLUNI PLLC50 DOAKS LANEMARBLEHEAD, MA 01945-3584UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Porous metal media for filtration, flow control, diffusion, sparging, and dispersion; sintered porous powder metal filtering media for general industrial use in the purification of air and industrial fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines used for the separation of solids, liquids, gases, and slurries; machines used for process filtration in a wide variety of industries; machines for filtering solids, liquids, gases, and slurries; machine components, namely, filters for filtering solids, liquids, gases, and slurries | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Flow regulators for industrial and commercial use; automatic liquid-flow control machines and instruments; flow switches for monitoring and controlling the flow of gases or liquids; metering orifices, namely, orifice plates and plugs for metering or controlling the flow rate of liquids; control valves for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; valves for controlling and regulating the flow of gases or liquids, not being parts of plumbing, heating, cooling installations, or cooling machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Filters for removing particulate matter from gases during manufacturing; air filters for industrial installations; liquid filters for industrial installations, not being parts of machines; solid filters for industrial installations; filters and filtering devices for air and gas conditioning; water filters; water filtering apparatus; water filtration and purification units; waste liquid and purification units; fibrous filtering media for general industrial use in the purification of air and industrial fluids; filters for fluids, namely, for water and area-water solutions; gas and liquid filtration housings and filter elements for general industrial use in the purification of air and industrial fluids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |