USPTO serial 86773194
JWPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, JOHN PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JWPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert O. Fox
ROBERT O FOX LUEDEKA NEELY GROUP PCPO BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901-1871UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Copper pipes for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; couplings made of metal for pipes for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; junctions for pipes of metal for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; metal joint connectors for pipes for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; pipes of metal for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; copper tubes for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems; tubes of metal for use in plumbing, water supply, drainage, sanitation, gas, refrigeration, HVAC systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |