Drawing for CRISP

USPTO serial 86773356

CRISP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRISP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Graham Coleman

M. GRAHAM COLEMAN Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Streaming of audiovisual and multimedia content via the internet; transmission and delivery of movies, television programs, ongoing television series, and ongoing multimedia programs via the internet; video-on-demand transmission servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing non-downloadable movies, television programs, ongoing television series, and ongoing multimedia programs, featuring news commentary, comedy and drama via a video-on-demand service, as well as information, reviews, and recommendations regarding motion pictures, television and multimedia entertainment content; providing a website featuring non-downloadable motion pictures, television and multimedia entertainment content, as well as information, reviews, and recommendations regarding television shows, movies, and multimedia entertainment contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance