CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PLATINUM MATRIX

USPTO serial 86774359

PLATINUM MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, BRANDON N
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLATINUM MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam C. Brink

1221 BroadwayOakland, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic products for face and body, namely, cleansing creams, exfoliating scrubs, creams, oils, skin fresheners, firming creams, serums, and toners; Non-medicated skin care products for face and body, skin care preparations, cleansers, creams, lotions, fruit acid peels, body polish, skin fresheners, moisturizing solutions, wrinkle removing preparations, masks, lightening creams and emollients; Sun care products for face and body, namely, sun block, sun screen, after-sun milksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 11, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 21, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 6, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 17, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance