Drawing for HOCKEY365

USPTO serial 86774848

HOCKEY365

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOCKEY365?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Mello

DAVID M. MELLO Onello & Mello Llp3 Burlington Woods Dr Ste 203Burlington, MA 01803-4514UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Duffle bags; all-purpose carrying bags; reusable grocery and produce bags and all-purpose carrying bagsACTIVE—
021Cups and mugs; coffee mugs made of glass, ceramic or plastic; tumblers for use as drinking glasses; beer mugs; mugs, not of precious metal; travel mugs; water bottles sold empty; water bottles sold empty made of glass, plastic, or metal; aluminum water bottles sold empty; portable coolers, portable beverage coolersACTIVE—
025Golf shirts; athletic apparel, namely, pants, jackets, footwear; sweat shorts; shorts; sweat pants; rugby shirts; hockey jerseysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2017IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 28, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 16, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance