USPTO serial 86775096
NAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luke Brean
EUGENE BELIY BREANLAW LLCPO BOX 4120ECM #72065PORTLAND, OR 97208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Caps; Hats; Jackets; Jeans; Shorts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Tank tops | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |