USPTO serial 86776625
A TO Z
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A TO Z?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Littleton, CO
Highlands Ranch, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore S. Maceiko
THEODORE S. MACEIKO Maceiko Ip420 2nd StreetManhattan Beach, CA 90266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for database management and providing graphical user interfaces in the areas of vehicle sales processes, maintenance, leasing, trade-in valuation, insurance, and presenting and arranging execution of documentation, for managing customer relationship and incentive programs, for enabling consumers to choose options for financing and accessories, and for providing information and conducting transactions over the Internet or other network in the field of motorized vehicles or dealerships therefor, namely, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2019 |
| 035 | Automobile dealerships; Dealerships in the field of motorized vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks and motor vehicles; Providing information about motorized vehicles for sale by means of the Internet; Administration of customer relationship programs, namely, programs which relate to phases of a customer relationship with a motorized vehicle dealership from initial purchase, subsequent maintenance and related customer relationship management services | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2019 |
| 036 | Appraisal and trade-in valuation services of motorized vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and motor vehicles; Financing of motorized vehicles | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2019 |
| 039 | Leasing of motorized vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and motor vehicles; Motorized vehicle sharing services, namely, providing temporary use of motor vehicles; Providing information about motorized vehicles for lease by means of the Internet | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing an online search engine service for new and used listings of motorized vehicles and motor vehicle related information, namely, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wallace, Aaron
- Other trademarks owned by Wallace, Aaron
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A TO Z
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |