USPTO serial 86777142
PERSONAL DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2016
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PERSONAL DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Noel C. Gillespie
Noel C. Gillespie Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ballistic resistant and blast resistant panels for installation in furniture, namely, desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers; protective barriers, namely, ballistic, bullet, blast, slash and stab resistant barriers in the nature of panels for installation in desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers [ ; protective furniture, namely, ballistic, bullet, blast, slash and stab resistant desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers, ] all of the aforementioned goods specifically intended for life saving purposes | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2016 |
| 020 | Ballistic resistant and blast resistant panels specifically fitted for furniture, namely, desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers; protective barriers, namely, ballistic, bullet, blast, slash and stab resistant barriers in the nature of panels specifically fitted for furniture, namely, desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers [ ; protective furniture, namely, ballistic, bullet, blast, slash and stab resistant desks, cabinets, benches chairs, cubical panels, room dividers, and rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers; Furniture, namely, ballistic resistant and blast resistant furniture; ballistic resistant and blast resistant desks; ballistic resistant and blast resistant cabinets; ballistic resistant and blast resistant benches; ballistic resistant and blast resistant chairs; ballistic resistant and blast resistant cubical panels; ballistic resistant and blast resistant room dividers; ballistic resistant and blast resistant rolling barriers in the nature of room dividers ] | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |