Drawing for FRESH SEA TASTE

USPTO serial 86778220

FRESH SEA TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH SEA TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell Ghaneie

MITCHELL GHANEIE LAW OFFICE OF L. JACK GIBNEY8777 SAN JOSE BLVD.SUITE 502JACKSONVILLE, FL 32217

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen seafood namely, fish, shrimp, crawfish, crab, lobster, clams, oysters, and scallops; fresh seafood, namely, fish, shrimp, crawfish, crab, lobster, clams, oyster and scallops not liveACTIVE—
031Fresh seafood, namely, live fish, shrimp, crawfish, crab, lobster, clams, oysters and scallopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 26, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 7, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance