Drawing for FIX

USPTO serial 86778271

FIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Brett Heavner

B. Brett Heavner FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGING AND FACILITATING PAYMENTS BETWEEN CONSUMERS AND THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS, SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING ANY SERVICES RELATING TO INVESTMENT SERVICES OR SECURITIES BROKERAGE AND TRADING SERVICESACTIVE—
038PROVIDING ON-LINE FORUMS, ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS, ELECTRONIC MAIL, VOICE AND VIDEO CHAT ROOMS AND TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CONSUMERS AND THIRD-PARTY SERVICES PROVIDERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 24, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 22, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 12, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2019OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2019CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 3, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 29, 2019EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2018ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 1, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 11, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 9, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance