USPTO serial 86780301
IHOUSETRAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHOUSETRAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nick Williamson
NICK WILLIAMSON BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N. BROADWAY, SUITE 3600ST. LOUIS MO, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices for environmental monitoring, control, and automation; Electronic devices for environmental monitoring and control, namely, environmental hazard detectors and sensors; Computer software for use in environmental monitoring, control, and automation systems; Computer software for mobile phones, tablets and other wireless devices, namely, software for use in recording, viewing, storing, sharing and analyzing online audio and video; Electronic devices and computer software that allow users to remotely interact with environmental monitoring, control, and automation systems; Electronic devices and computer software that allow the sharing and transmission of data and information between devices for the purposes of facilitating environmental monitoring, control, and automation; Water sensors; Electric or electronic sensors to detect and record the presence of water; Environmental hazard detectors, namely, devices to detect and record the presence of water; Software application for use on computers and hand-held devices to control environmental monitoring, control, and automation systems in homes and businesses from a remote location; Software application for use on computers and hand-held devices to monitor and control, from a remote location by wired or wireless communication, devices for environmental monitoring and control, namely, environmental hazard detectors and sensors; Wireless cameras; Digital cameras; Environmental hazard detector-activated cameras; Video cameras; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, digital video recorders and electronic components of environmental hazard detection systems; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images and videos to remote locations; Environmental hazard detection system consisting of environmental hazard detectors and sensors that can be controlled wirelessly from a remote location | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |