Drawing for PROFLOW

USPTO serial 86781494

PROFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael L. Gannon

Michael L. Gannon 3M Innovative Properties Company3M Center, 2501 Hudson RoadBldg. 220-9E-01St. Paul, MN 55144

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Powered air respirators not for artificial respiration; Respirators, namely, respirators for filtering air not for artificial respiration; respiratory protection apparatus for use with respirators for filtering air not for artificial respiration, namely, respiratory masks, respiratory headtops, gas masks, protective breathing masks; replacement parts for respirators for filtering air not for artificial respiration, namely, filters, inserts, cartridges, canistersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance