Drawing for CHEEKY KIDS

USPTO serial 86782616

CHEEKY KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEEKY KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle A. Cooke

Michelle A. Cooke Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP11355 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper table clothsACTIVE—
021Cold packs used to keep food and drink cold; Portable coolersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2016GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2016GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2016CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2016UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance