USPTO serial 86782906
PICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Farley
Susan E. Farley HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | knockwurst; kielbasa; dry sausage; frozen meat; beef; poultry; jerky; fresh sausage; frozen sausage; sausage | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | scones; cake; cheesecake; Danish muffins; doughnuts; pies; puff pastries; cupcakes; Danish pastries; Danish buns; Danish cakes; croissants; eclairs; cream puffs; extracts used as food flavoring; cooking extracts, namely, vanilla extract, almond extract, cinnamon extract, lemon extract, mint extract, anise extract, peppermint extract, orange extract, and nut-based extract | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |