Drawing for AMAZECITY

USPTO serial 86782985

AMAZECITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMAZECITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT L.L.C.50 SOUTH 16TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile applications where users can post ratings, reviews, referrals, recommendations, information, itineraries and photographs relating to restaurants, local attractions and events, historic attractions and events, parks and recreational areas, transportation, hotels, and entertainmentACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to post ratings, reviews, referrals, recommendations, information, itineraries and photographs relating to restaurants, local attractions and events, historic attractions and events, parks and recreational areas, transportation, hotels, and entertainmentACTIVE—
045Online social networking services where users can post ratings, reviews, referrals, recommendations, information, itineraries and photographs relating to restaurants, local attractions and events, historic attractions and events, parks and recreational areas, transportation, hotels, and entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 6, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 6, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance